Skip to Main Content

Identify knowledge (Library & Writing Centre orientation, Stage 3)

Orientation designed for students who are in the latter half of their program. What do you know about research and writing at this point? What do you need to know more about?

Beyond keyword searching

Close up image of a great horned owl looking at the camera, green leafy foliage in the backgroundResearchers are having conversations with each other in the scholarly literature

Even when you're sure there's relevant information out there on your topic, it can be hard to track down those details. When you start feeling bogged down with your keyword searches, try thinking about the scholarship on your topic as a conversation between researchers. All the articles, books and other documents you find are voices in a conversation on your topic. Since the conversation is written down and referenced, you can track the voices that interest you by paying attention to citations.

Use citations to search for other resources

  • Look backwards in the conversation. Check the bibliographies or references of the resources you have found and search for the titles cited in them to see what conversations have already happened on your topic.
  • Look forward in the conversation. Search Google Scholar for articles you already know are good and click on the “Cited by” links. This will take you to a new Google Scholar search results list of all the documents that cited that paper so you can see what conversations happened after the article was published.

Scan for trends and leads

As you read articles, notice frequently cited authors, significant research projects and papers, or new keywords and phrases related to your topic. You can use these leads to expand your search and find other relevant materials: 

  • Use Discovery or Google Scholar to search for other works by the cited authors. Both Discovery and Google Scholar allow you to search by author name under their "Advanced Search" screen. You can also use Google Scholar to search for other researchers, organizations, or universities that are mentioned in resources.
  • Google the names of leading authors to find a bibliography of their works.
  • If you keep coming across articles from the same journal, browse through some current issues in the entire publication (start with the "Journals" tab on the Library homepage).

Image by Mark Edwards from Pixabay

The problem with citation counts

Students often focus on the number of citations an article has received as an indicator of how important each article is in the scholarly conversation. You can find that number in the "Cited by" link in Google Scholar. Basically, a citation count shows how much attention that work has received from other scholars in the same field. This can be a useful indicator of significance!

However, citation counts can be problematic. Specifically, citation metrics have known issues with systemic racism and sexism: IBPOC scholars, female-presenting scholars, and scholars from the Global South are consistently underrepresented in citations, historically and presently. Additionally, it's important to consider citation counts in the context of how current the resource is: e.g., an article from 2022 is not likely to have many citations, simply because it was published so recently.

These factors should not detract you from paying attention to citation count — it's still a helpful indicator of significance — but please do not rely on citations alone to determine the articles you use in your work.

Evaluating what you find

You've found an article, book, or other material that seems relevant to your topic. It's important to evaluate the trustworthiness of that resource, but how do you do that? How can you tell whether the information you've found is up-to-date, credible, and accurate?  

Here are some important aspects to consider and questions to ask yourself when evaluating any resource.

  • When was it written or updated and how much does that matter with your topic?
  • Has the discourse around your topic changed since this content was written?

Tip: If you want to find literature published within the last 5-10 years, look for the date limiter option.  In Discovery and Google Scholar, it appears after you have conducted your search on the left-hand side of the screen.

  • Where was it published (in a journal, on the web by an independent organization)? How credible is that source? 
  • Who wrote it? What do you know about the author(s)? What makes this person, or these people, qualified to write on this topic?

Tip: One way to check out an author is to simply Google their name. See what you can discover about who they are, what they do, what else they have published, and how other people have responded to their work. You can also do this with organizations and publications.

  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed?
  • Does the author frame their argument in related literature? Where did they get their information from? Do they cite relevant material? Is there evidence in the article of good data collection practices?
  • Knowing what you know, and taking a mental step back from the text, do the arguments and assertions seem credible, well-reasoned, and balanced? How do they mesh with what you already know?
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
  • What have other people said about the document? If the material is a blog post, have other readers commented and provided opposing viewpoints? If the item is a journal article, how often has it been cited and what have those authors said?

Tip: You can get a sense of the conversation around a scholarly article by looking at the 'cited by' link in your Google Scholar results list. However: remember to weigh the number of citations against the currency of the document. It takes a while for material to get cited.

  • What is the intended purpose of the publication? (To inform, teach, sell, entertain, sway opinion?) Do the authors/sponsors make their intention clear?
  • Who was the material written for? Who is the intended audience?
  • What biases might the author or sponsor bring to the work? Are there political, ideological, cultural, religions, institutional or personal biases that might affect what information is presented and how?
    • Do you detect any bias in the author’s perspective or does the author state a bias or shortcoming to the work? Is the language provocative or even handed?
    • What about the bias of the publishing body that made the article available? Was the research funded by any particular organization or business? How might that perspective influence the research? 
  • How does the author's/sponsor's purpose suit your purpose?

Lateral reading

As you're considering each of the facets above, keep in mind the practice of lateral reading. Basically, that means that instead of drilling deeper into a single website to assess its credibility, you should look at other sources. For example, if you're wondering whether an author is really an authoritative source on a topic, you shouldn't just rely on what they say about themselves, because if they're a bad actor (or even if they aren't), that information may be misleading or just framed to seem exceptionally positive. It's better to find out what other people have to say about that author's credibility, and compare several different sources to find the consensus perspective. Good media literacy means doing this regularly for everything you read (whether it's for a class or just out in the world). It can be time-consuming, but it is also crucial to combatting disinformation and making sure you're relying on good, accurate, current information.

And of course -- if you're ever feeling lost with this process and would like some help evaluating a resource, feel free to contact the Library for assistance!

Knowing when to stop

One of the hardest parts of any research process is knowing when enough is enough. It's easy to start following the trail of interesting articles only to find yourself buried in information and miles from your original research question! There's no "one easy trick" for knowing when you're done (in fact, the notion of search saturation is a whole field of study in itself), but here are a few tips to keep in mind:

  1. Stay on task. Try not to get sidetracked by articles that aren't directly relevant to your central research question. Skimming articles before reading can help you avoid going down tangential rabbit-holes in your searching. It's also very important to have a clearly defined research question/topic to begin with! If you find you're mostly retrieving tangential material, you're probably wasting your time. Take a step back and re-evaluate your topic and search strategy.
  2. Notice when you hit the point of diminishing returns. There's a lot of information out there, but there's only so much that's truly relevant to your topic. Eventually, if you're searching well, you'll start seeing the same articles over and over again. If you've searched the relevant databases (including Discovery and Google Scholar) using a variety of keywords and skimmed your article bibliographies for relevant references, and you're not turning up much that's new and interesting — congratulations, your search is complete!
  3. Keep within the assignment boundaries. Unless and until you're writing a doctoral thesis, you really don't need to achieve full search exhaustivity. Pay attention to your assignment requirements (in terms of number and type of references), and use that as your touchstone. It's a good idea to collect more sources than are required and then pare down (so you can make sure you're finding the most useful and relevant items), but if you've got four or five times as many citations as the assignment calls for, it's time to either stop searching or re-evaluate your strategy.